Legal Opinion

United States v. Arnold N. Mahler

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 26, 1966No. 467, Docket 30374PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

Appellant was convicted below of knowingly giving false testimony to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) investigators, and of conspiring to do the same, under 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001 (1964). He was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. We affirm.

There is no attack on the overall sufficiency of the evidence, and a brief background statement will clarify appellant’s principal contention, which relates to an overt act. The jury could have found the following facts from the government’s case: Appellant owned and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. Benjamin IndiviglioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. BorelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. Cramer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. SpatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Robert Henry Sykes and Haydon David Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Daniel Lee Rucker and Eugene C. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Bernard J. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Charles GreenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API