Conger v. James
Tennessee Supreme Court
The judgment of, the circuit court of Davidson county, in this case, was rendered upon the facts stated in tlie opinion, at the May Term, 1852, Manet, Judge, presiding. The plaintiff appealed in error. cited H&wlcmd vs. Douglas, 2 Johns.
Read the full summary
The judgment of, the circuit court of Davidson county, in this case, was rendered upon the facts stated in tlie opinion, at the May Term, 1852, Manet, Judge, presiding. The plaintiff appealed in error. cited H&wlcmd vs. Douglas, 2 Johns. B., 62; Borrow vs. Todd, 3 Hid., 367; 9 lb., 212; 10 II., 143; 17 11., 405; Peck’s B., 274; 7 Yerg., 253-4-8; 6 Humph., 171-4. cited Billings on Awards, 46, 92; 8 East, 450; Dyer, 242, a; 2 Bing., 199 ; 7 East, 81 ; 8 Ilid., 13; 16 Ibid., 58; 6 Ves., 70; 7 Mod., 345; 2 Brev. Bep., 62; 19 Wend., 68; 14 Johns., 95; 5 Smedes & Marsh., 712; 3 Harr., 442; 1 Pike,…
1Opinion of the CourtTotteN, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant in the circuit court ■of Davidson, on his carpenter’s bill, for building a house for defendant. Some payments had been made, but the justice of the account, as stated, was disputed. Thereon, the parties, by a bond to that effect, referred the whole case to the award of Atkinson and Simpson. Their award was to be the judgment of the court. In their reference bond, the parties recite that their object is, “to get their disputes, differences, and mutual claims oh each other in the premises, finally settled.” And they say: “We agree that said arbitrators shall…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Jackson v. ChambersTennessee Supreme Court · 1974