In Re the Ad Valorem Valuation of Property of Pine Raleigh Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
RodmáN, J.
Appellee urges an affirmance on two grounds: (1) Petitioner, not having applied to the State Board in 1960 when the property was appraised, could not seek a reduction in 1961 based on past income, a fact known in 1960; and (2) the appraised value was determined after due consideration of all facts bearing on that question.
Appellee moved before the State Board to dismiss petitioner’s appeal on the theory that not having sought review in 1960, it was concluded and could not seek a review in 1961. State Board denied the motion to dismiss. It proceeded to hear evidence on which it could…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Somers v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Old Colony Railroad v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Donovan v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Bragg Investment Company v. Cumberland CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- In Re the Appeal of AMP Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Yadco, Inc. v. Yankton CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- King v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.