Legal Opinion

Brower v. Rosenbaum & Little

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1921No. 21381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from chancery court of Lauderdale county. Hon. G-. C. Tann, Chancellor. Suit by Rosenbaum & Little and others against A. J. Brower and others, with cross-bill by defendants. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSykes, J.

This appeal from a decree of the chancery court of Lauderdale county presents the sole question whether or not that court was correct in allowing a solicitor’s fee for the appellees, complainants in the lower court,- out of the proceeds of a sale of timber; the fee being taxed against the interests of all of the owners of the timber. This fee was allowed under section 3542, Code of 1906 (Hemingway’s Code, section 2854).

In their bill the complainants claimed title to an undivided four-elevenths interest in the timber growing upon certain described lands in Lauderdale county, and that certain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hoffman v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Neblett v. NeblettMississippi Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Potts v. GrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Billingsley v. BillingsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. BlackmonMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lewis v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Parnell v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sutton v. SuttonMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Travelers' Fire Ins. v. PriceMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API