Polar Supply Co. v. Steelmaster Industries, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
An Alaskan company, Polar Supply Company, Inc. (Polar), purchased a telescopic trolley boom from Steelmaster Industries, Inc. (Steelmaster), a Canadian corporation located in Ontario. Polar had a number of problems with the boom and brought suit against Steelmaster in the Alaska superior court. Steelmaster-argued that it was entitled to dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, and the superior court agreed, dismissing Polar’s suit. 1 We .reverse because we conclude .that an exercise of personal jurisdiction over Steelmaster is appropriate under Alaska’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FieldsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Barlow v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Harper v. Biolife Energy Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Samson Tug & Barge Co. v. KoziolDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2012
- Tera Bunton, Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen A. Lingley v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Dan KaneAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.