Legal Opinion

Polar Supply Co. v. Steelmaster Industries, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2005No. S-11664PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

An Alaskan company, Polar Supply Company, Inc. (Polar), purchased a telescopic trolley boom from Steelmaster Industries, Inc. (Steelmaster), a Canadian corporation located in Ontario. Polar had a number of problems with the boom and brought suit against Steelmaster in the Alaska superior court. Steelmaster-argued that it was entitled to dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, and the superior court agreed, dismissing Polar’s suit. 1 We .reverse because we conclude .that an exercise of personal jurisdiction over Steelmaster is appropriate under Alaska’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FieldsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Barlow v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Harper v. Biolife Energy Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Samson Tug & Barge Co. v. KoziolDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2012
  5. Tera Bunton, Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen A. Lingley v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Dan KaneAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API