Legal Opinion

Mallicoat v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 29, 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’BRIEN, Judge.

OPINION

Defendant was convicted of contributing to the delinquency of a minor and sentenced to eleven months and twenty-nine days in the Knox County Penal Farm.

Several assignments of error are made. The State calls to our attention that three of these assignments were not stated in defendant’s motion for new trial and, for that reason, may not be raised on appeal, under the authority of Pruitt v. State, 3 Tenn.Cr.App. 256, 460 S.W.2d 385. In exceptional circumstances, especially in criminal cases, appellate courts, in the public interest, may, of their own motion, notice errors…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stiller v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  3. United States v. Jan Alvord Wilkerson, United States of America v. Ransom John Gray, United States of America v. Charles Lee BurnetteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. Manning v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. GarlandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  3. State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  4. State v. LaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API