Legal Opinion

Voight v. Walters

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

This is not a proper case for declaratory judgment. Any opinion given in the present action would be advisory only, and probably of no avail. There is no allegation in the complaint that a decision is necessary in order to guide the plaintiff or that she will be guided by any such decision.. Sec. 269.56, Stats., so far as material, reads:

“(2) Any person interested under a deed, will, written contract, or other writings constituting a contract, or whose rights, status, or other legal relations are affected by a statute, municipal ordinance, contract, or franchise, may have, determined any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Town of Tryon v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Tietjens v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Mainella v. Board of Trustees of Policemen's Pension or Relief FundWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Schoenbrun v. NettrourSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DSG Evergreen Family Limited Partnership v. Town of PerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. DSG Evergreen Family Limited Partnership v. Town of PerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  3. FPL Energy Point Beach, LLC v. Energy Resources of Australia Ltd.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API