Legal Opinion · Dissent

Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc. v. Holliday

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1984No. C-1891Published

1DissentRay, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority has reached a result and has adopted reasoning to which I cannot subscribe. Under the majority’s opinion, directors of a dissolved corporation will be able to escape their statutorily-imposed fiduciary duty to creditors; they will be free to pick and choose among the creditors they wish to pay, secure in the knowledge that creditors who do not receive their pro rata share will have no claim against them individually so long as the directors pay out at least an amount equal to the corporate assets on hand at dissolution. This result is patently inequitable,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lyons-Thomas Hardware Co. v. Perry Stove Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Tigrett v. PointerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. R. M. Waggoner v. Herring-Showers Lbr. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fagan v. La Gloria Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API