Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kim v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1991No. S-3741, S-3744Published

1DissentRabino Witz, Chief Justice

I dissent from the court’s dismissal of the petition as improvidently granted. In my view, the Anchorage police may not solicit the Army’s direct assistance to enforce state laws against civilians in a civilian area. To employ such assistance is a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, related statutes and implementing regulations. Based on my study of the record, I would grant the petition, hold that the Act had been violated, and require the exclusion of all evidence obtained with the Army’s illegal assistance.

FACTS

Petitioners do not contest the facts set out in Moon v. State, 785 P.2d 45,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Ruby Davidson Walden and William Luther WaldenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  3. Metropolitan County Board of Education v. KelleySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. State v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API