Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sandra Fredericks v. John D. Elliot

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1983No. 82-2463Published

1DissentLay, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would find that the plaintiff has substantially complied with the service of process under the South Dakota statute. There exists no rational basis to deny plaintiff her day in court simply because her attorney mailed the notice of service to the Secretary of State at the same time he notified the defendant. The defendant was provided with proper notification of the claim and the court in which he was sued. It constitutes a complete miscarriage of justice to deny plaintiff her day in court on an alleged technical violation of the statute.

Although the majority is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Larry Luke, Individually v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Larry Luke, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  3. Gifford v. BowlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Hartley v. Jerry's Radio & Electric ShopSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Bomann Golf, Inc. v. Cosmos Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API