Parker v. Windborne
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
At the outset, we note that the deposition of plaintiff forecasts sufficient evidence to be considered by the jury as to the negligence of the defendant Gloria O. Windborne. The fact that she drove the automobile into the plaintiff on the highway while the visibility was clear is some evidence that she did not keep a proper lookout or keep the vehicle under control and bring it to a halt so as to avoid a collision. This is evidence of negligence.
Since'the materials submitted and considered by the court forecast at tria] sufficient evidence of negligence by the defendant Gloria O.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Ragland v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Blake v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Garmon v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Price v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCullough v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983