State of Maine v. David M. Wyman

[¶ 1] David M. Wyman appeals from a judgment of conviction of perjury (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. § 451(1)(A) (2014), entered by the trial court (Anderson, J.) after a jury trial. David contends that the State failed to present direct evidence of the falsity of his testimony that gave rise to the perjury charge and that the evidence was therefore insufficient to support his conviction. He also argues that the court abused its discretion in admitting cell phone billing records. We reject David’s contentions and affirm his conviction.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] On April 20, 2011, Jeffrey P. Wy-man was…