Legal Opinion

Premier-Pabst Corporation v. Elm City Brewing Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 28, 1935No. 2320PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

H1NCKS, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s counsel has argued that the defendant’s appropriation of the words “Olde Maestro” is an enjoinable appropriation of a property right in the plaintiff, in that it is an appropriation by a competitor of “advertising value” paid for by the plaintiff. But the meaning which is thus assigned to the phrase “advertising value” is so uncertain that I am unable to pass upon the validity of the claim. I prefer to treat it as an invitation to analysis.

That every man has a privilege for purposes of trade to use and publicize his own legal name or his own trade-name or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tone Brothers, Inc. v. Sysco Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. John Wright, Inc. v. Casper Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. The Federal Glass Company v. Samuel Loshin and Nathan LoshinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. French American, Etc., Co. v. Park Plastics Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API