Legal Opinion

Rives v. Logan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 6, 1993No. 92-03256PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioners, Browder W. and Howard P. Rives, seek a writ of prohibition to disqualify the respondent, Judge Paul E. Logan from the underlying case. We deny the writ.

The petitioners’ motion to disqualify the respondent was denied by Judge Logan as legally insufficient. Following our review of the motion to disqualify and the accompanying affidavits, we agree with Judge Logan’s determination that the motion was legally insufficient.

The motion states that the petitioners fear that they will not receive a fair hearing because of the respondent’s bias and prejudice. The factual allegations…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fischer v. KnuckSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Gieseke v. GrossmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick JamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Solana v. SolanaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Wehbe v. UejbeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API