Legal Opinion

Burke v. Breazeale

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1841PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court for Natchitoches, Campbell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The plaintiff claims $2949, which he alleges is due to him by the defendants, Breazeale and Boyce, at whose request he dug a ditch of 983 rods in length, which at three dollars per rod amounts to the sum claimed. He admits he has been paid $525 by Breazeale, $280 hy Boyce, and $200 hy Bordelon, whose property was also benefited.

The defendants severed in their answers. Boyce admitted the contract alleged in the petition, hut averred that the ditches were not *74cut of the depth or width mentioned in the contract, but are so shallow and narrow, that they have failed to answer the intended object…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coates v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Livaudais v. SpearSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  3. Royer v. Royal Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API