Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Goldammer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 4, 2002No. 01-3075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. This case presents the natural corollary to Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, 245 Wis. 2d 632, 629 N.W.2d 277. In Baierl, our supreme court held that a landlord who includes an attorney's fees provision in a residential lease, which is specifically prohibited by Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 134.08(3), may not enforce the terms of a lease against tenants who had prematurely abandoned the rental property. Baierl, 2001 WI 107 at ¶¶ 2, 5. The court determined that'the inclusion of the prohibited provision did not render the contract a legal nullity, but reasoned that to allow the landlord to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  2. Baierl v. McTaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Chapman v. ZakzaskaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Burstein v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Town of Beloit v. County of RockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dawson v. GoldammerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  2. Shister v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  3. Abbott v. MarkerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API