Legal Opinion

Scheiber v. Protected Home Circle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 15, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Hume, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

Two contentions are presented by this appeal. Defendant’s contention is that George S. Scheiber was not a member of its society at the time of his death, nor since June, 1906; while plaintiff contends, and the court below held, that the notice of suspension was not sufficient to operate as a forfeiture of all claims under the benefit certificate issued to Scheiber by defendant.

The court held as a proposition of law that the insanity of Scheiber “did not relieve him from a compliance with the rules and regulations of the defendant society, relating to the reinstatement of suspended members.”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. AmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hansen v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hamilton v. ScullyIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. McLaughlin v. Supreme Council Catholic Knights of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Noel v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitlow v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Rintoul v. Sun Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API