Legal Opinion
William E. Brock, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Kenneth Hendershott and Edgar Platel
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1988No. 87-3151PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Hendershott and Platel appeal from a summary judgment decision against them by the district court. As the matter now stands, the defendants must disgorge profits obtained through abuse of their positions as union representatives in charge of negotiating various collective bargaining agreements. For the reasons set out below, we affirm.
I
In this case the Department of Labor seeks repayment of sums realized by Kenneth Hendershott and Edgar Platel, two union representatives who benefited from their locals’ choice of a dental association. The facts show the two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harlan L. Jacobsen v. Richard FillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley BankDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1979
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Tommy Mercer and Wanda Jo MercerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Dennis M. Wolfel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Donovan v. DaughertyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Renchenski v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Estella Timms v. Anthony M. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Al Nieto, Clarence Valdez, Adrian Munenmann, Lester Olivera and Joana L. Gonzales v. Louis Ecker, and Roger FrommerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Smith v. Provident BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.