Legal Opinion

United States v. Jesus Mata-Abundiz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1983No. 83-3046PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Mata-Abundiz was convicted of possession of a firearm by an illegal alien. At trial, the only evidence of Mata’s alienage was his admission to a criminal investigator for the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) that he was a citizen of Mexico. Mata made the statement while he was jailed on state charges. He was not given Miranda warnings. The question presented is whether the investigator’s failure to give Mata the Miranda warnings makes the answers inadmissible in a subsequent criminal prosecution. We conclude that it does and reverse the conviction.

I.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. John W. Hinckley, Jr. United States of America v. John W. Hinckley, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Alford, Cecil EdwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. Jose Rosa v. Frank McCray and Eliot L. SpitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API