Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Springfield Utility Board

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 9, 2021No. 6:19-cv-01595Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON TODD ROBERTS, Case No. 6:19-cv-1595-MC Plaintiff, v. ORDER SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD, a Public Body, et al., Defendants. _____________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: When taking what appears to be an unscheduled vacation day from work, Plaintiff misrepresented to his now former Employer, the Springfield Utility Board (“SUB”), the reason for his absence. Defendant SUB hired attorney Kathy Peck to advise them with regard to Plaintiff’s continued employment. Peck, in turn, assigned an associate attorney, Dian Rubanoff, to conduct an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API