Legal Opinion

Harshaw v. Mustafa

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1987No. 109PA87PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

This appeal raises the issue of whether plaintiffs, who are sureties on bonds issued by their principal, defendant Mustafa, can sue their principal before paying all or part of the penal amount of the bonds. We conclude that they cannot and therefore reverse the Court of Appeals.

Plaintiffs brought this action alleging that they are sureties on two appearance bonds, in the total amount of $25,000, to assure the appearance of defendant Mustafa in the District Court of Guilford County on 31 May 1985. Defendant failed to appear. Although the presiding judge ordered forfeiture of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American National Fire Insurance Company v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Hodges v. . ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carle v. Wyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton, LLPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Bognc, LLC v. Cornelius Nc Self-Storage LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API