Legal Opinion

Puglisi v. Belasky

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Suit to have instrument recorded as mortgage removed from county clerk’s records.

1Opinion of the CourtLazansky, J.

The owners of certain premises contracted to convey the same to the defendant Belasky who assigned his interest in the contract to defendant Mininson. By the terms of the contract $500 was paid at the time of the delivery thereof. June twelfth was named as the law day. By agreement of the parties it was adjourned to July tenth. The contract provided: “ All sums paid on account of this contract and the reasonable expense of the examination of the title to said premises are hereby made liens thereon, but such liens shall not continue after default by the purchaser under this contract.” On June…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elterman v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Champion v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  3. Irving v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Gillig v. . MaassNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  5. Ihrke v. Continental Life Insurance & Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newpar Estates, Inc. v. BarillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Corning v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, New York County Courts1959
  3. Loew v. K. C. & B. Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Precision Performance, Inc. v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API