Tribulas v. Continental Equitable Title & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maniey :
I agree that a new trial should be granted in this case but in that trial plaintiff’s right of recovery should not be limited by binding instructions to the item of $1,000 on the check for which W. J. Fitzpatrick’s name appears as a witness. Whether or not plaintiff is entitled to recover all the sums which she declares were paid out on forged endorsements is entirely a question of fact and is therefore for the jury.
The majority opinion says: “When this suit was begun, the first account stated had gone unchallenged for more than 14 years, the second…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- New York County National Bank v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Shipman v. Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.