Legal Opinion
Ostroll v. Nargizian
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 26, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMalone Jr., J.
Plaintiff commenced this action alleging that, as a result of a motor vehicle accident, she sustained serious injuries as provided by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) under the permanent consequential and significant limitation of use categories. Specifically, plaintiff alleged that she sustained serious injuries to her neck, shoulder, spine and upper arm. Following discovery, defendant Raymond A. Nargizian (hereinafter defendant), the owner and operator of the vehicle in which plaintiff was a pas*1077senger at the time of the accident, successfully moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Franchini v. PalmieriNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- John v. EngelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Howard v. EspinosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raucci v. HesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Putnam v. Sysco Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Lemieux v. HornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Putnam v. Sysco Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Raucci v. HesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014