Rackley v. Chestnutt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was a civil ACTION, tried at December Term, 1891, of the Superior Cpurt of Sampson County, Boylcin, J., presiding. The action was brought for the recovery of the possession of the land described in the complaint, and for the correction of a certain deed from one Jacob Chestnutt to one Eliza J. Chestnutt, his grandchild, and who afterwards intermarried with the plaintiff, and died, leaving one child, an infant of a few weeks, who also died, leaving the plaintiff…
Read the full summary
This was a civil ACTION, tried at December Term, 1891, of the Superior Cpurt of Sampson County, Boylcin, J., presiding. The action was brought for the recovery of the possession of the land described in the complaint, and for the correction of a certain deed from one Jacob Chestnutt to one Eliza J. Chestnutt, his grandchild, and who afterwards intermarried with the plaintiff, and died, leaving one child, an infant of a few weeks, who also died, leaving the plaintiff surviving. A copy of the said deed is hereto attached, marked exhibit “A,”' and made part of this case. The only issue submitted…
1Opinion of the Court
Shepherd, J.:
This case is governed by the principles declared in Vickers v. Leigh, 104 N. C., 248; Moore v. Quince, 109 N. C., 85, and Saunders v. Saunders, 108 N. C., 327. The judgment is, therefore,
Affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vickers v. . LeighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Saunders v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Moore v. . QuinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- Whichard v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Whichard v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Whichard v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921