Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
*531The following answer was returned:
To the Honorable Senate:
That Congress and State Legislatures have broad and extensive powers of investigation is no longer open to serious doubt. While it was questioned at one time whether Congress could act as the grand inquest of the hation (Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U. S. 168) that view is not now law. McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U. S. 135; Sinclair v. United States, 279 U. S. 263; Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U. S. 125. In order to legislate it is necessary to be informed and investigation is usually a prerequisite to adequate information. The same thought in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BootonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Eggers v. KennySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- State v. DamianoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. ManneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.