Legal Opinion

Crenshaw v. Crenshaw

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 26, 1994No. 1930606PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis Crenshaw sought a judgment declaring that his father, F.W. Crenshaw (the decedent), did not make a valid inter vivos gift of certain personal property to the defendant, Fred W. Crenshaw. The trial court entered such a judgment. Fred W. Crenshaw appealed. The appeal presents three issues: (1) whether the testimony of the decedent's attorney and the attorney's secretary was properly excluded as subject to the attorney-client privilege; (2) whether the testimony of witness Betty Crenshaw Hendricks was inadmissible under the Dead Man's Statute or was privileged under the attorney-client…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Edwards v. VanzantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Lett v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Branch v. Greene County Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Bertarelli v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lynch v. HamrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Bennett v. CIT Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
  3. Crenshaw v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API