Crenshaw v. Crenshaw
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis Crenshaw sought a judgment declaring that his father, F.W. Crenshaw (the decedent), did not make a valid inter vivos gift of certain personal property to the defendant, Fred W. Crenshaw. The trial court entered such a judgment. Fred W. Crenshaw appealed. The appeal presents three issues: (1) whether the testimony of the decedent's attorney and the attorney's secretary was properly excluded as subject to the attorney-client privilege; (2) whether the testimony of witness Betty Crenshaw Hendricks was inadmissible under the Dead Man's Statute or was privileged under the attorney-client…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Edwards v. VanzantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Lett v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Branch v. Greene County Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Bertarelli v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lynch v. HamrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Bennett v. CIT Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Crenshaw v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994