Cohn v. Armstrong Tire & Vulcanizing Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry C. Moran, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1920. Affirmed. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely
By this appeal defendant seeks the reversal of a judgment against it in an action of forcible detainer tried by the court.
Counsel for plaintiff insists that as no propositions of law were presented to the trial court, there is noth' ing for this court to review. This point was so emphasized in argument and by the citation of a large number of cases, including, however, none of the many decisions of this particular court, holding to the contrary, that we have delayed our opinion until the disputed point was definitely decided by the Supreme Court. This has been done in opinion filed October…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Ball v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Duncan v. MoloneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904