Legal Opinion

A.J.S.M.P. v. Markwayne Mullin, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 17, 2026No. 1:26-cv-03163Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA A.J.S.M.P., Civil No. 1:26-cv-03163-MWJS Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND vs. DENYING RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO HOLD PETITIONER’S EAJA MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Secretary of U.S. MOTION IN ABEYANCE Department of Homeland Security, et al., A# 220-797-798 Respondents. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND DENYING RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO HOLD PETITIONER’S EAJA MOTION IN ABEYANCE A.J.S.M.P. is a formal federal detainee proceeding by counsel. He initiated this action by filing a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Schlanger v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API