Logston v. State

DICKSON, Justice.

Defendant Harold I. Logston, Jr., was convicted of robbery and found to be a habitual offender. He raises the following issues in this direct appeal:

1. note-taking by a juror,

2. limitation of cross-examination regarding past mental problems,

8. use of prior juvenile record for impeachment,

4. sufficiency of evidence of identification,

5. absence of arraignment or initial hearing on habitual offender charge,

6. sufficiency of habitual offender information, and

7. authentication of documents.

1. Note-Taking by Juror

The defendant first contends that reversible error occurred because…