Hubbard v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
Donald Robert Hubbard appeals from his convictions for child molestation, OCGA § 16-6-4 (a), and aggravated child molestation, OCGA § 16-6-4 (c). Evidence showed Hubbard fondled and orally sodomized the 11-year-old victim. The only issue before this Court is Hubbard’s claim that his trial counsel was ineffective because she failed to move for a Jackson-Denno hearing on the admissibility of Hubbard’s confession to police. The trial court denied Hubbard’s motion for new trial based on that claim, and we affirm.
To prove an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Brogdon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Marks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Shelby v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- PERCELL v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Carswell-Danso v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006