Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Paulson

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 5, 2021No. 6:19-cv-00438Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JEFFERY SCOTT ROGERS, Case No. 6:19-cv-00438-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. REED PAULSON; WILLIAM STRAUSS; and CHRISTOPHER DIGIULIO, Defendants. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Jeffery Scott Rogers (“Rogers”), an individual in the custody of the Oregon Department of Corrections (“ODOC”), filed this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against Christopher DiGiulio (“Dr. DiGiulio”), Medical Director at the Oregon State Penitentiary (“OSP”), and two OSP medical providers, Reed Paulson (“Dr. Paulson”) and William Strauss (“Dr.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API