Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 5, 1993No. 92-3046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

Hubert Brown appeals his sentences as an habitual offender for the offenses of possession of cocaine1 and possession of drug paraphernalia.2 Brown contends that the trial court erred in failing to make the findings required by section 775.084(l)(a), Florida *298Statutes (1991),3 and in sentencing him as an habitual offender for possession of drug paraphernalia, a first-degree misdemeanor. We affirm Brown’s sentence as an habitual felony offender as to the possession of cocaine offense; however, we vacate his sentence as an habitual felony offender as to the possession of drug…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Tarver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Crenshaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pompa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Wells v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API