Brown v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DIAMANTIS, Judge.
Hubert Brown appeals his sentences as an habitual offender for the offenses of possession of cocaine1 and possession of drug paraphernalia.2 Brown contends that the trial court erred in failing to make the findings required by section 775.084(l)(a), Florida *298Statutes (1991),3 and in sentencing him as an habitual offender for possession of drug paraphernalia, a first-degree misdemeanor. We affirm Brown’s sentence as an habitual felony offender as to the possession of cocaine offense; however, we vacate his sentence as an habitual felony offender as to the possession of drug…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Tarver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Crenshaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pompa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Wells v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994