Legal Opinion

Brant v. Bockholt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 24, 1995No. 93-1736PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

Plaintiff, Jonas Brant, who was awarded some damages in a personal injury action growing out of an automobile collision, appeals from that judgment. He urges that the damages awarded were inadequate, involved inconsistent elements of recovery, and were the product of erroneous jury instructions. The defendants in the action are Tina Bockholt and Brenda Neil, who were the driver and the owner, respectively, of an automobile that collided with another vehicle in which plaintiff was riding as a passenger. After considering the arguments presented, we conclude that the district…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. ElliottAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Edward L. Flanigan v. Burlington Northern Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Harue HayashiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Braddock v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Clinton Physical Therapy Services, P.C. v. John Deere Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. Pexa v. Auto Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Estate of Pearson v. Interstate Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Fisher v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Kevin Bryant v. Robert Lee Rimrodt and Geico General Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API