Legal Opinion
Santiago Gonzalez v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 23, 2002No. 01 CIV. 7189(JES), No. 89 CR. 0404(JES)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Petitioner pro se, Luis Santiago Gonzalez (“petitioner” or “Gonzalez”), brings the above-captioned action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. In support of his petition, Gonzalez alleges that: (1) crucial inculpatory evidence was obtained without a warrant; (2) his fifteen-year term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) was improper because his superseding indictment incorrectly cited 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2), which sets a maximum penalty of ten (10) years…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. William BokunCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Tyrone Perez, Also Known as Larry, Also Known as StarkyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keating v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Moore v. New York (Erie County)District Court, W.D. New York · 2005