Liter v. Ozokerite Mining Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the district court of .the first district, and from an order refusing a new trial. The abstract in this case did not show that any motion for a new trial had been made, nor any statement or bill of exceptions ever settled, or that any exception to the charge of the court had been taken, or that the evidence-included in the alleged abstract was all the evidence in the case, nor that any appeal had been taken from anything.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the district court of .the first district, and from an order refusing a new trial. The abstract in this case did not show that any motion for a new trial had been made, nor any statement or bill of exceptions ever settled, or that any exception to the charge of the court had been taken, or that the evidence-included in the alleged abstract was all the evidence in the case, nor that any appeal had been taken from anything. But the respondent in his brief made no objection to the abstract. One of the errors relied upon by the appellant was a remark made by the trial…
1Opinion of the Court
Zane, 0. J.:
This action was brought, as alleged, to recover $950 compensation for labor performed by the plaintiff at the instance of the defendant. The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that the defendant was a corporation under the laws of the State of blew York. This allegation the defendant denied. To prove it the court admitted in -evidence a paper purporting to he a copy of the certificate of incorporation of the defendant, signed and duly •.acknowledged by Jacob Wallace, Hibbert B. Masters, and Charles H. Barkley, three of the five trustees mentioned therein. To these articles was…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Kilpatrick-Koch Dry-Goods Co. v. BoxUtah Supreme Court · 1896
- Salina Canyon Coal Co. v. KlemmUtah Supreme Court · 1930