Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

City & County of Denver v. Duffy Storage & Moving Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 14, 1969No. 23940, 23941Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Hodges

I concur with the majority opinion in affirming the judgment of the trial court as to the invalidity of Ordinance No. 234 imposing the so-called “earnings tax for general revenue purposes.” I likewise concur with the majority in affirming the judgment of the trial court upholding Ordinance No. 232 which imposes the business and occupational privilege tax.

However, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion insofar as it upholds the validity of Ordinance Ño. 233 which imposes a so-called “Employee Occupational Privilege Tax” of $2.00 per month. Regardless of *106the name affixed to this tax,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City and County of Denver v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Post v. City of Grand JunctionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  3. City of Englewood v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Jackson v. City of Glenwood SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Ping v. City of CortezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API