City & County of Denver v. Duffy Storage & Moving Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Hodges
I concur with the majority opinion in affirming the judgment of the trial court as to the invalidity of Ordinance No. 234 imposing the so-called “earnings tax for general revenue purposes.” I likewise concur with the majority in affirming the judgment of the trial court upholding Ordinance No. 232 which imposes the business and occupational privilege tax.
However, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion insofar as it upholds the validity of Ordinance Ño. 233 which imposes a so-called “Employee Occupational Privilege Tax” of $2.00 per month. Regardless of *106the name affixed to this tax,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City and County of Denver v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Post v. City of Grand JunctionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- City of Englewood v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Jackson v. City of Glenwood SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Ping v. City of CortezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.