Legal Opinion

Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 2002No. 2000 CA 0465 RPublished

1Opinion of the CourtLwhipple, J.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court granted Dow’s application for writs of cer-tiorari and review,1 reversed and set aside the portion of the previous opinion rendered May 11, 20012 pertaining to plaintiffs’ damages, and remanded to this court to determine the proper quantum for plaintiffs’ damages.3 The essential facts and procedural history, as set forth in this court’s previously published opinion, are as follows.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Quebedeaux and Dandridge were both employed by Dow as operators in the making of polyethylene, or plastic,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caudle v. BettsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  3. Odom v. Claiborne Elec. Co-Op., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API