Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Dysart v. M'Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1849PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the Common Pleas of Huntingdon. May 25. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the charge of the court below, which was delivered by Wilson, President, and is subjoined. ££ The relator, James Dysart, by his information of the 2d of September, 1847, complains that ‘ for a long time past, to wit, for the space of one month and more, Jonathan M’Williams and John S. Isett, Esquires, both of the township of Franklin in the county of Huntingdon, have, as the…

Read the full summary

Error to the Common Pleas of Huntingdon. May 25. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the charge of the court below, which was delivered by Wilson, President, and is subjoined. ££ The relator, James Dysart, by his information of the 2d of September, 1847, complains that ‘ for a long time past, to wit, for the space of one month and more, Jonathan M’Williams and John S. Isett, Esquires, both of the township of Franklin in the county of Huntingdon, have, as the relator has been informed and truly believes, under and by colour of the authority of an act of Assembly of this…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of this court was delivered by

Bell, J.

The gravamen of the relator’s complaint is, that the defendants claimed to exercise the office of supervisors and assessors of taxes in the township of Franklin, and the right and authority to assess upon, and collect from, the inhabitants of the township, taxes and large sums of money, for the use of “ the Spruce Creek and Water Street Turnpike Company,” without any warrant or lawful authority for exercising the same, under and by colour of an act of Assembly, passed the 13th day of April, 1846. The defendants, by their plea, take issue upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. M'CloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
  2. M'Clenachan v. CurwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1802

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sherman v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Sautter v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Gotshall v. J. Langdon & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Klick v. GernertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. McKay-Smith v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API