Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bishop v. Hamlet

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1961No. 35713Published

1DissentFoster, J.

(dissenting) — I dissent from the decision affirming the judgment. The court does not have jurisdiction of this appeal, so it must be dismissed. In such circumstances, the court is powerless to affirm the judgment. Johnston v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co., 89 Wash. 494, 154 Pac. 787.

The appellate jurisdiction of this court is derived solely from Art. IV, § 4, of the state constitution, which, so far as material, is:

“. . . excepting that its appellate jurisdiction shall not extend to civil actions at law for the recovery of money or personal property when the original amount in controversy,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McIntyre v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Doty v. KrutzWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bleecker v. Satsop RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Green v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Johnston v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API