Legal Opinion

U. S. Bonds v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 20, 1997No. A96A2314, A96A2315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

U. S. Bonds (“the surety”) entered into recognizance bonds with the State of Georgia on behalf of two principals, defendant Bonilla and defendant Echeverría. The bonds required U. S. Bonds to honor its obligations as surety until the trial court excuses the principals — *759via leave of court — from having to appear in court “from day to day and from term to term. . . .” When the principals failed to appear in court when they were required to do so, the trial court declared the bonds forfeited and issued writs scire facias notifying the surety that execution hearings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. AAA BONDING COMPANY v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Griffin v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Colbert v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Kwik Bond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. RELIABLE BONDING CO., INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Osborne Bonding & Surety Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API