Legal Opinion

Cobas-Torres v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 1987No. 85-554PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Although the trial court erred in refusing to permit defendant to introduce extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement made by a prosecution witness, § 90.614(2), Fla.Stat. (1983), we deem the error harmless because the evidence of guilt was overwhelming. Mahone v. State, 222 So.2d 769 (Fla.3d DCA 1969); § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1983); cf. Thornes v. State, 485 So.2d 1357 (Fla. .1st DCA) (exclusion of testimony regarding prior inconsistent statement of sole eyewitness to crime not harmless error considering other errors made by trial court), review denied, 492 So.2d 1335 (Fla.1986); see…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Johnson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. OverfeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Palmes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. Streeter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Spellman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API