Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 2018No. 126PA17Published

1Dissent

Justice MORGAN dissenting.

Based upon application of the rudimentary principles of statutory construction, I respectfully disagree with the decision of my learned colleagues. In reaching the result in this case, the majority has devalued, and essentially ignored, the operation of the descriptive word "specific"

**668in its interpretation of North Carolina General Statutes Section 8C-1, Rule 412(b)(2) and this provision's usage in the present case.

"Statutory interpretation properly begins with an examination of the plain words of the statute." Three Guys Real Estate v. Harnett County , 345 N.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Correll v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Frye Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Peele v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API