Legal Opinion

In re Moe

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 29, 1987No. 87-1361PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*932The petitioner appealed to this court. After oral argument, we issued an order striking from the order of the Superior Court the above limitation, thus leaving to the petitioner the choice of location of the procedure. Our rescript issued immediately. The purpose of this opinion is to explain the reasons for our decision.

The statutory provisions involved in the present proceedings are found in the second paragraph of G. L. c. 112, § 12S, as appearing in St. 1980, c. 240. They read: “If a pregnant woman less than eighteen years of age has not married and ... if she elects not to seek the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Francis X. BellottiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  5. Planned Parenthood Assn. of Kansas City, Mo., Inc. v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re DoeTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re DoeTexas Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API