Legal Opinion

Brest v. Broslan Jewelry Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 1948Published

1Opinion of the Court

It was error to direct a nonsuit upon the ground that the evidence established that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. (See Hente v. Shercoop Corp., 289 N. Y. 140; Heimer v. Stento, 270 App. Div. 665; Richards v. Rohert Corp., 271 App. Div. 924, affd. 297 N. Y. 605; Barnett v. 41-43 East 28th St. Corp., 271 App. Div. 749.) Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hente v. Shercoop CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Heimer v. StentoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Richards v. Lawrence Robert CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1947