STEVE LYNN MOTOR COMPANY INC. v. Pavelka
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Justice.
Plaintiff declared on two promissory notes, alleging he had acquired the notes for value without notice and was owner and holder thereof. Defendant maker answered that plaintiff was not an innocent purchaser for value, and that the payee had agreed, contemporaneously with execution and delivery of the notes, that the payee “would not press defendant for collection and would not sue him upon the notes.” Judgment was rendered for plaintiff on instructed verdict. We affirm.
Defendant contends the instructed verdict was not authorized because there was evidence to raise a fact…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dolson v. De GanahlTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Howeth v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Bill Jones v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Robertson v. City National Bank of BowieTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Lassiter v. Boxwell Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mason v. Mid-Continent Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- McPherson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Cicero Smith Lumber Company v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Roseborough v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Ralls-Tex Mill, Inc. v. PLAINS WHITE TRUCK COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.