Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Woods

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 30, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Habt, J.,

(after stating the facts). When the plaintiffs had drilled the first well under the original contract to a depth of 1,538 feet, the log kept by them contained this notation, “well is showing oil and gas very heavy.” According to the evidence for the plaintiffs, they reported this fact to a representative of the defendant, who was on the ground, and received orders to shut down and wait for the casing which was to be furnished by the defendants in making a test for- oil and gas. The log shows that the plaintiffs next began to' drill on October 10, 1921. They say that the defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murray v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Ozark & Cherokee Central Railway Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Weaver v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Paul v. MeserveySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. Benton County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Farelly Lake Levee District v. McGeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API