Legal Opinion

Christie v. Kimball

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2012No. B230286PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

In probate court, nothing speaks more eloquently or provides more insight into factual and legal issues than an accounting.

Here the probate court lacked sufficient information to mle on three consolidated cases involving a trust. It determined that an accounting could well serve that purpose. We conclude the probate court’s general power to supervise administration of trusts permits it to order a trustee’s accounting on its own motion. We further conclude that such an order standing alone is not appealable.

Danita Christie, a trustee, appeals an order requiring her to file…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. People v. Kathy P.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bank of California v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Schwartz v. LabowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Esslinger v. CumminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Conservatorship of FarrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Dunlap v. MayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Garcia v. Roberts CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Hernandez v. Princess Windows CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API