Legal Opinion
Aguon-Schulte v. Attorney General of Guam
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 27, 2006No. 05-16067PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.
This case involves an appeal from a district court’s order denying a request to strike outside counsel and remanding the case to the Guam Superior Court for failure to join all defendants in the removal action. Generally, a district court’s order denying a motion to disqualify counsel is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 pri- or to final judgment in the underlying litigation. Further, remand orders issued under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) and invoking the grounds specified therein that removal was improvident and without jurisdiction are usually immune from review under §…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aguon-Schulte v. Guam Election Com'n.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006