Legal Opinion

Nieman v. First National Bank of Joplin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1967No. 24680PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPERRY, Commissioner.

Plaintiff, Neville Marie Nieman, had obtained a judgment against Otto F. Nie-man, Jr., her former husband, for alimony, child support and attorney fees, which had accumulated to a claimed total of $1,407.75, including costs. She summoned First National Bank of Joplin, Missouri, hereafter referred to as garnishee, in an effort to collect that sum from assets of Otto F. Nieman, Jr., in its custody. Mrs. Hazel Nieman, the widowed mother of Otto, intervened. She moved to dissolve the garnishment and to dismiss the proceedings. The judgment was that intervenor’s motion to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commerce Trust Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Cordes v. StraszerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Slinkard v. Lamb Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Schnellmann v. Southern Commercial & Savings BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Greenwood Ex Rel. Greenwood v. Bank of IllmoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Remax of Blue Springs v. Vajda & Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Robson v. DiemMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. American Bank v. WegenerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Food Services Corp. v. RheamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API